Mary Allen
Introduction
Animal lovers often find themselves hesitant to watch movies that include scenes of animal cruelty or death. One such movie that has sparked this concern is Togo, a 2019 Disney+ original film about the 1925 serum run to Nome, Alaska. The movie follows the story of Leonhard Seppala and his sled dog, Togo, as they brave the treacherous Alaskan wilderness to deliver medicine to a town suffering from a deadly outbreak of diphtheria. The question on many viewers’ minds is, "Does the dog die in Togo, and if so, what is the best answer?" This article will explore the fate of Togo and the ethical implications of using animals in entertainment.
The role of animals in film
Animals have played a significant role in film since the early days of cinema. From Lassie to Marley and Me, dogs have been a beloved staple of family movies. However, not all movies featuring animals have a happy ending. Some films, such as Old Yeller and A Dog’s Purpose, have been criticized for their portrayal of animal deaths. The use of animals in film raises questions about their welfare and the emotional impact on viewers.
Togo’s plot and themes
Togo tells the true story of a sled dog who played a crucial role in the 1925 serum run to Nome, Alaska. The movie explores themes of perseverance, sacrifice, and the bond between human and animal. The film is a tribute to the bravery of the sled dog teams who saved the town of Nome from a deadly epidemic. The movie is a heartwarming tale that showcases the strength and loyalty of Togo, the lead sled dog, and his owner, Leonhard Seppala.
The fate of the dog in Togo
Spoiler alert: Togo dies in the movie. However, his death is not depicted graphically on screen. Instead, it is implied through a montage of flashbacks and voiceovers. The filmmakers chose to focus on Togo’s heroic actions and his legacy, rather than his death. While some viewers may find the portrayal of Togo’s death upsetting, the movie has been praised for its respectful and tasteful handling of the subject.
Controversy surrounding animal deaths in film
The use of animal deaths in film has long been a controversial topic. Some argue that it is necessary to accurately depict the realities of life, while others believe that it is unnecessary and harmful to animals. In recent years, there has been a shift towards using CGI and other special effects to simulate animal deaths in movies. This has helped to reduce the number of actual animal deaths in film, but it has also raised concerns about the use of technology to manipulate viewers’ emotions.
The use of CGI in animal death scenes
The use of CGI has become increasingly popular in movies featuring animals. This technology allows filmmakers to create realistic animal characters and simulate dangerous or violent scenes without harming real animals. While the use of CGI has been praised for its ability to reduce animal cruelty in film, some critics argue that it can be just as emotionally manipulative as real animal deaths.
The emotional impact on viewers
Movies featuring animals often elicit strong emotions from viewers. The death of a beloved animal character can be particularly traumatic for children and animal lovers. While some argue that these emotional responses are a necessary part of storytelling, others believe that it is unethical to manipulate viewers’ emotions in this way.
The importance of warning labels
Many movies featuring animal deaths now include warning labels to alert viewers to the content. These labels can help viewers make informed decisions about whether to watch the movie. However, some argue that these labels are not enough and that more needs to be done to protect animals in film.
Alternatives to animal death in film
There are several alternatives to using animal deaths in film. One option is to use trained animal actors and carefully choreographed scenes to simulate danger without actually harming the animals. Another option is to use CGI or other special effects to simulate animal deaths. While these alternatives may not be as realistic as using real animals, they can still create a compelling and emotionally impactful story.
The ethics of using animals in entertainment
The use of animals in entertainment raises ethical questions about their welfare and the responsibilities of filmmakers. While some argue that animals should not be used in film at all, others believe that it is possible to use animals ethically and responsibly. The American Humane Association has established guidelines for the use of animals in film, including the requirement for trained animal handlers, veterinary care, and humane treatment.
Conclusion: what viewers should consider
Viewers who are concerned about animal welfare in film should consider several factors when deciding whether to watch a movie. These factors include the use of warning labels, the alternatives to animal deaths, and the ethical considerations of using animals in entertainment. By making informed decisions, viewers can support responsible filmmaking and protect the welfare of animals.
Resources for animal welfare advocacy
There are several organizations that advocate for the welfare of animals in film, including the American Humane Association and PETA. These organizations provide resources for filmmakers, animal trainers, and viewers to promote responsible filmmaking practices. By supporting these organizations, viewers can help ensure that animals are treated with respect and dignity in movies and other forms of entertainment.